Andrew Fribush

fig. 2.8.3: the grain rule through the source’s cold years, with and without the supply response

fig. 2.8.3 · the grain rule through the source’s cold years, with and without the supply response.
SUPPLY RESPONSE: 23.6 BACK TO 9.4 IN A YEARWITH THE SUPPLY RESPONSE, ELASTICITY 0.35BOUND ALONE, NO RESPONSEONE LINE IS ONE 20-YEAR RUN OF THE GRAIN RULE, THE HARVEST AT 0.71 IN THESHADED YEARS; THE LIT LINE IS THE RUN NAMED ABOVE.COVER, IN YEARS OF NEED · TARGET 1.0COLD YEAR, HARVEST 0.7100.51.005101520YEAR OF THE RUNRESPONSE 1.00BOUND ALONE 0.69GRAIN PRICE · REFERENCE 10 · THE PANEL IS THE CLAMP, 3 TO 14031030100140CEILING, 14 TIMES REFERENCEFLOOR, 0.3 TIMES REFERENCE05101520YEAR OF THE RUNRESPONSE 10.0BOUND ALONE 20.1

source: vicky @ 93c9f5e · game/sim.py lines 41-71 (constants and the derived surplus), 259-270 (price rule), 1157-1158 (cold years), 1200-1216 (production, supply response, noise, consumption, then carry); docs/economy.md lines 97-102 (the 7.3 and the measured drift) · deterministic run of the source rule with fixed need · granary.data.ts

View in context: Why the grain price drifted → · All figures

Andrew Fribush, software and computer engineer in Austin. I build consequential systems where software meets institutions: finance, healthcare, commerce, government data, and the mechanisms that govern AI agents. Taking new engagements: hello@andrewfribush.com.